South Korean Automobile Market - Non-Tariff Barriers Essay

South Korean Automobile Market - Non-Tariff Barriers - Essay Example The postulation looks at the refreshed exchange examples and determinant of complete traveler and street vehicle exchange between the U.S and S. Korea. The primary illustrative variable is the impact of S. Korea’s Non-Tariff Barriers (NTBs) on the vehicle business exchange with its one of the greatest exchanging accomplice, the U. S. The examples and execution of vehicle industry exchange and the impacts of NTBs in S. Korean vehicle market will be surveyed by the Normalized Trade Balance Index, Grubel and Lloyd list and the relapse that is by utilizing different relapse examination draws near, more explicitly. The consequences of the postulation will feature the pattern of the street and traveler vehicle industry exchange and the effect of NTBs on the volume/estimation of exchange car segments between the nations since the start of the 2000s. S. Korea and the U.S share a lot of enthusiasm for seeking after positive improvement in the car industry’s exchange execution. The two nations considerably depend on the benefits of the car exchange for their monetary development and their market sizes are frequently enormous. (Dyer and Chu, 2000). Subsequently, S. Korea and the U.S Free Trade Agreement is going to happen and probably the greatest issue that drawn out the arrangement while haggling for the FTA was in regards to the car, particularly traveler vehicle industry exchange. President Obama and the U.S business agents guaranteed that the FTA bargain with respect to car exchanging system isn't reasonable on the off chance that they begin to exchange respectively in the current condition and guideline. Adversaries of ongoing FTA arrangement even asserted that the U.S automakers overstate the possible deals in S. Korea of vehicles delivered in U.S. gathering plants (Schott, 2010).â

30+ Writing Podcasts You Should Be Listening To

30+ Writing Podcasts You Should Be Listening To 30+ Writing Podcasts You Should Be Listening To Well†¦ don’t attempt to tune in to all these composing digital recordings - or you’ll never get any composing done!With the huge prominence of book recordings and webcasts, you could undoubtedly say that we’re in a time of ‘peak sound content’ - and for book fans and sprouting authors, there’s never been a superior time to get close exhortation from a scope of voices. To praise the second period of Reedsy's Bestseller digital broadcast, we’re filling you in on probably the best composing webcasts around.Publishing and Self-PublishingPublishing a book is no simple accomplishment. Also, in the event that you decide to do it without anyone else's help by going down the autonomous distributing course, there’s a ton you’ll need to find out about promoting, plan, and circulation. Fortunately, you won’t be lacking in incredible exhortation from the individuals who have done it before.Bestseller by Reedsyâ€Å"The con clusive insider's manual for our current brilliant period of television.†Ben Blacker of The Thrilling Adventure Hour lets his audience members listen in into discussion with the absolute greatest names in TV composing. On the off chance that you fantasy about composing TV dramatization, or are only a Netflix junkie, you’ll need to tune in for his discussions with any semblance of Vince Gilligan (Breaking Bad), Amy Sherman-Palladino (Gilmore Girls and The Marvelous Mrs. Maisel) and Damon Lindelof (Lost).Have we passed up a major opportunity your most loved web recording? Drop a message in the remarks beneath and let us know!

What Is The Propaganda Model?

What Is The Propaganda Model? At the point when Edward S. Herman and Noam Chomsky talked about the purposeful publicity model in the book called Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Mediaâ from the political economy perspective. They brought up that cash and force can channel a portion of the data, permitting the administration and lawmakers to spread their words to people in general. Despite the fact that the reason for media isn't for publicity just, its primary extent is utilized for promulgation (Herman Chomsky, 1988). They contend that each bit of unique day by day news in America is under exacting checking before they can be distributed, the news guards including possession, sponsor and sources. Starting here, the media are completely lost in serving the individuals who can control and bolster them, speaking to the enthusiasm of the well off and incredible class in the general public. They called the checking procedure as five channels of the news, which is likewise the focal thought of the promulgation model. The newsfilters are running from cash dominators, promoters, sources, to fire and anticommunism. Through breaking down the five channels, they are isolating the purposeful publicity model into two sorts: the main example is described as checked through the official control to serve the individuals who are the prevailing class in the general public. While the last promulgation type is hard to be seen, the media consistently reveals embarrassment by the specialists and scrutinized the legislature to persuade people in general. When the overall population have confided in the media, they will normally follow the media and bolster those administration approaches that media is pushing. That is exposure ruse played between the media and the prevailing class. The last sort is increasingly significant in Chomskys sentiment. The principal channel delineates that the financial specialists hoarded the media. Take the paper for instance, savage rivalry in the benefit driven free market bring about stressing increasingly about the perusers. Besides, the advancement of procedure implies the expense is expanding, for the average workers paper, the expense is generally low, in this way at that point, and they need to stop the serious market. Since the media entered the benefit driven market, the capital of the goliath media firms are commonly constrained by the huge undertaking, the board, the investors and the financiers in the endeavor are thinking more about the benefit as opposed to the nature of the news. In this way, it isn't amazing that the media mammoths are tied up with rich circles. The media are exceptionally dependence on the promoters in the benefit driven market, which implies the picking of the publicists, will impact the media significantly. On one hand, the impressive income from publicizing will normally expand the mainstream media item. In other word, it is difficult to get the help from the promoters without the evaluations ensure. As Herman and Chomsky (Herman Chomsky, 1988.) contended in their book that it was the purchasing power from the crowd pulling in the media most. Subsequently, it isn't hard to comprehend why the paper is going in reverse and in emergency while the general public is creating. Then again, Sponsors frequently separate both the common laborers and radical media strategically (Herman Chomsky, 1988), in which the promoters would prefer to consider progressively about the individuals who have incredible buying power than poor people. News source is the third channel. Sources structure the administration and the organization can address the issue of media association: utilizing the dependable sources from the legislature and the organization, can guarantee the goal of news announcing; then again, through getting the news sources from the administration and the monster organization, the productions can remove a lot of pointless use spending on exploring other untrustworthy sources. Herman and Chomsky called the fourth channel as fire and the implements (Herman Chomsky, 1988, p.26.), that is, the administration and the significant enterprise can squeeze the media. Here, fire implies terrible criticism of a media program. The media will follow through on extraordinary cost for the negative reaction; they need to guard themselves in or out of the organization, even in the court. In addition, the publicists will pull the promotion also. As indicated by Chomsky, the fire is by and large from the individual in power. Under such weights, the media can just speak to the enthusiasm of the financial specialists. The fifth channel is called anticommunism as a control system. In here, they are alluding to the media are pushing socialism approaches (strategies that are compromising the property benefit, particularly the America property benefit) as a danger to the bourgeoisie. As expressed over, the initial three channels are increasingly significant in the purposeful publicity hypothesis. Basically, the system of the purposeful publicity model is equivalent to different speculations; they are starting with heaps of theories, and afterward return to the presumption through close to home understanding (Klaehn, 2003). Despite the fact that Jeffery (2003) contends that the promulgation model is an idea result from the investigation on the connection of media and the specialists deliberately and legitimately. Be that as it may, not the same as other research, Chomskys confirmations appear to be missing of influence. Furthermore, this model is for the most part concentrating on the newsroom structure, it can't be utilized to dissect the general reporting practice. Plus, despite the fact that Klaehn has clarified some analysis about the contrast between guard hypothesis and publicity model, and contended the purposeful publicity model is just utilized for the examination of the system yet not the mental procedure of the media (Klaehn, 2005). There are a few likenesses despite everything can be found between them: the point of the news organization is to fulfill the promoters instead of draw in the crowds under the benefit driven market; each bit of news should be amended bit by bit before being printed; so as to lessen the cost, an enormous number of news offices are attempting to diminish the insightful substance so as to abstain from being scrutinized or claims. Clearly, Chomskys promulgation model is to a great extent concentrating on the American news coverage vulnerable War time frame. He contends that the publicity model assumed a significant job during the Cold War time frame; the media is sullen the center of the model. He isn't just presuming that the media is smothering open analysis of the administration, getting the general population far from reality; yet in any event, taking into account that the media is answerable for stretching the Cold War. The purposeful publicity model is generally relevant in America due to the news culture in the US (Chomsky, 2007).Most of the media bunch in the US are having a place with the private possession and not sponsored by the administration, monetarily autonomous. A lot of the media are constrained by a set number of enormous organizations, who are additionally managing everything well with the legislature through the political gifts on the exchange of weapons. Therefore, they are some of the ti me including in the national strategy making also. Then, the wellsprings of news are required to be acquired through the official channels, for example, the question and answer session or the individual meeting. So as to get the direct data, the writers should manage everything well with the administration offices, which will likewise influence the media demeanor towards the governmental issues. From the Chomskys purposeful publicity model it very well may be seen that so as to reinforce the target picture to the general population, the media possession are utilizing the method of aggregation and merger of little media organizations to make grater in power, impact, height, or notoriety. Now and again, the legislature assumed an associate job in this procedure, charging some little media organizations to let them chapter 11 in view of the intensely cost of the claim, while the monster media is advantage from the impact and force. Along these lines it tends to be seen that the media a nd the legislature in the US are firmly associated. Hence, media in the US are continually practicing self-restriction. In spite of the fact that Chomsky utilizes the promulgation model to scrutinize the media in the Europe, it is missing of generalizability all things considered. Klaehn has composed on her article that there was a typical analysis on the promulgation model: the purposeful publicity model is to be examined under the speculated condition that there is no distinction among the interior the decision class, however that will never occur in the truth (Klaehn, J. 2002). As Chomsky and Herman have clarified in their book, it is like the accentuation inside the book, the purposeful publicity of some definitive nation is distinctive to the media of the U.S. Truth be told, energetic discussions is permitted and supported in the U.S., just when it doesn't go too far. (Herman Chomsky, 1988). In addition, they have made another further clarification that we utilized the ideas of commendable and contemptible casualties to portray this dichotomization, with a hint of incongruity as the fluctuating treatment was obviously identified with political and financial bit of leeway as opposed to anything like genuine worth (Herman, 2000). Discussing this, Colin Sparks, from the University of Westminster has suspected whether this model can be utilized to clarify each setting of the media in the UK. Colin (Sparks, 2007) took the case of the Iraq War announcing in the UK and contended there were loads of looks into indicating that numerous media in the UK questioned the authenticity and propriety of the Iraq war. He accepts promulgation model disregard the confusion of entrepreneur society. From the prudent angles, the clashing interests among the distinctive division inside the free enterprise will be everlasting. It is notable that the US media about corner the media business on the planet. The publicity model has filed the biggest utility during the global news correspondence. Be that as it may, media in different nations are not continually following what the Americans need. At the point when the announcing harms the enthusiasm of the nation or the revealing is unjustly un

A Sickness Called Death The Significance of Salamanos Dog - Literature Essay Samples

The French novel The Stranger, written by Albert Camus and translated by Matthew Ward, describes a French-colonized Algeria in the 1940’s. Throughout the novel, central arguments and themes are being linked together by different scenes. In the scene that brings into focus Salamano and his dog, Camus demonstrates that routine is an illusion of control, the nearness of death leads to awareness of the choice between serenity and sorrow, and that all choices are equal. Camus uses Salamano’s treatment of his dog as a symbol for routine in order to demonstrate the importance of routine—an illusion of control. In terms of appearance, it seems that Salamano cares more about his dog after his dog was gone than when the dog was in his company. Camus describes that Salamano’s daily routine with the dog consists of â€Å"[them standing] there on the side walk and [staring] at each other, the dog in terror, the man in hatred† and Salamano constantly swears, yanks, and spits at the dog (Camus 27). However, after the disappearance of his dog, Salamano searches the streets again and again looking for his dog. This reveals Salamano’s dependence on his dog—an inseparability whose roots lie within the comfort of routine. Even though they have been together for eight years, they never change their routine. Furthermore, when Camus has Meursault suggest that Salamano should get a new dog, the latter replies that he â€Å"wa s used to this one,† just as Salamano was â€Å"used to [his wife]† (Camus 44). Camus suggests that it is not just about caring for or loving the dog, but rather seeking comfort in the routine that they had together, just as most people do. Salamano did not have a happy life with either his wife or the dog, but he gets used to it regardless—and thus chooses to remain in this comfort zone. Camus further illustrates that as Salamano and his dog become old together, they have even ended up â€Å"looking like each other† (Camus 26). On the other hand, Salamano could have easily prevented the escape of his dog, but the existence of a routine distracts him from the possibility of his dog escaping. Through this faulty assumption of Salamano’s, Camus suggests that routine not only gives comfort to the individual, but also makes the individual unconscious in the grand scheme of life. Even though Salamano â€Å"[has] been meaning to get [his dog] a smaller c ollar for a long time, [he] never thought [his dog] would take off like that† (Camus 38). Although Salamano knew that the collar was too big, he thought he had control of his dog because it is part of the routine and it has never happened before. Salamano breaks the routine by stopping to watch â€Å"The King of Escape Artists† (Camus 38). Just as â€Å"The King of Escape Artists† creates the illusion that the chains can hold him, Camus blinds Salamano with the illusion that the collar can hold his dog since the dog has not escaped before. By creating the illusion of control, Camus shows how some people can get blinded by routine. Moreover, Camus draws parallels between the dog and Maman to show that the nearness of death leads to awareness of the choice between serenity and sorrow. Just as the relationship between Meursault and his mother, the relationship between Salamano and his dog is not a happy one either. In fact, the relationship between Salamano and his dog is rather miserable; Salamano complains that the problem with his dog is that â€Å"he is always there,† as if the dog has become a burden to him (Camus 28). Camus compares this relationship with the relationship between Meursault and Maman, where Maman lived with Meursault for a long time until Meursault begins to see her as a burden as well. Meursault barely speaks to Maman and eventually sends her to a home. In the end, the dog runs away and Maman dies. When Meursault hears Salamano weeping over the loss of his dog, Meursault â€Å"thought of Maman† (Camus 39). Camus draws a parallel between the two relationships to present the cho ice between serenity and sorrow. While Salamano cries over missing his dog, Meursault does not react much to the loss of Maman. Salamano chose to be sorrowful over his loss while Meursault chose to not display emotions even at the funeral of Maman. Camus suggests that the choice between serenity and sorrow is decided by oneself and how one perceives death of another, or even himself. Conveying a further philosophical message, Camus shows the futility of choice by implying that all choices are futile and equal. In the scene in which Salamano is telling Meursault about the condition of his dog, Salamano recalls how he rubbed the dog with ointment every day after the dog had gotten that skin disease, Salamano says that â€Å"the dog’s real sickness was old age, and there’s no cure for old age† (Camus 45). Camus illustrates the futility of choice by showing that regardless of whether or not Salamano rubs his dog with ointment, his dog will still die as his dog cannot escape the inevitable death of old age. Although his dog appears to have attained freedom and escapes from the collar, the choice he makes is futile and equivalent to the other choice of staying, because whether the dog escapes or not does not affect the ultimate outcome. The dog is sick with death, and choices made in the face of death are equivalent to one another as the final outc omes are the same: death is inevitable. Furthermore, it does not matter whether Salamano looks for his dog or not; it does not matter whether he gets a smaller collar for his dog or not; it does not matter whether his dog comes back or not; the escape of the dog does not even matter, because eventually the dog will die and so will Salamano. No matter what choices people make, everyone dies regardless of anything. Camus’ implications show that all choices are equal and futile because the ultimate outcome, death, will come no matter what. Camus cleverly and efficiently communicates central themes and arguments throughout the book with only a few sentences in a scene. Camus also connects these arguments with other philosophical ideas, notably the futility of choice. However, while all choices do not change the ultimate destination in one’s life, death, they are not futile or equal to one another if it changes the path one will take to reach that destination. The interaction between all choices intertwine and forms the world that everyone lives in; Every choice made affects the future, however small. Some choices delay the arrival of death, while others can have the opposite effect. But even though this topic can be argued forever, it is important to note Camus’ final revelation regarding the value of life. Meursault states that â€Å"Salamano’s dog was worth just as much as his wife;† One of Camus’ final arguments is that people can be just as sorrowful towards a dog or a wife (Camus 121). Although the life Salamano led with his dog and his wife are not happy ones, they are as equally worthy as any other life. When death strikes like â€Å"a dark wind,† one would realize that the routine they have been relying is just an illusion of control; however, one can still choose between serenity and sorrow, even if that choice is futile in that it does not avoid the arrival of death (Camus 121).

How to Make Blue Fire with the Easy Method

Making blue fire is an easy DIY project, and theres more than one way to do it. Here are a couple of pointers for making it yourself. Natural Blue Fire The easiest way to make blue fire is to burn a chemical that naturally produces a blue flame. Most types of alcohol burn as blue fire:Â   Ethanol (e.g., rum, vodka)Methanol (wood alcohol, Heet fuel treatment)Isopropyl alcohol (rubbing alcohol) Natural gas also burns with a blue flame. Easy Method of Making Blue Fire Several metal salts burn with a blue flame, such as certain copper, arsenic, and lead compounds. Antimony and lead are toxic, but you can use copper(I) chloride to produce blue fire. Add a small amount of water to copper(I) chloride to dissolve the salt. If you cannot find copper(I) chloride, it is possible to make this chemical yourself. Copper(II) chloride is more widely available, but it will burn with a blue-green flame.Soak a flammable material with the copper chloride solution. Good choices include sawdust or pine cones.Allow the material to dry.When you light it or add it to a normal fire you will get blue fire.

The Trial of Jesus Essay - 1484 Words

In The Judaeo-Christian Tradition by Jack H. Hexter, the trial of Jesus is addressed in an unorthodox perspective. The trial of Jesus incorporates two trials: the Roman trial and the Jewish trial. In Hexters book the Roman trial is addressed in great length while the Jewish trial is almost unaddressed. Hexter provides a perspective of the trial of Jesus with only one cause: the charge of sedition, for claiming to be king of the Jews. By using the four gospel texts, Hexters view is illuminated and we find crucial aspects to the trial that not only counter Hexters view on the sedition charge but also provide evidence for other important charges. Themes other than the charge of sedition supporting Hexters perspective include, the†¦show more content†¦Hexter blames Pilate for being the sole decision-maker for the death of Jesus, but once again, the Four Gospel texts allude the Jewish community for being a major influence upon the death of Jesus. Hexter begins his thesis with on e sentence stating that only Pilate gave the order of Jesus death: â€Å"...who in turn gave him to the procurator Pontius Pilate for trial.† (Hexter 63) Hexter does not address the Jewish community that is in upheaval during a time of Passover or Pilates role throughout the trial. Pontius Pilate, as Roman Governor, had a position to fulfill to the Roman population along with the Jewish community. During a time of Jewish Passover, along with the chaos Jesus had created, Pilate was under great influence from many outside factors. â€Å"The stir created by Jesus preaching and the size of his following perturbed both the Roman and the Jewish authorities, fearful of any wind that might fan the smoldering discontent in Palestine into a raging flame of revolt.† (Hexter 62) In the Roman trial, Pilate was chosen to judge Jesus on the act of sedition, however counter to Hexters perspective, repeatedly stated that he saw no case against him. In the Gospel of John, it is apparent that Pilate not only doesnt want to be involved but is puzzled at the situation at hand. â€Å"Your own nation and the chief of priests have handed you over to me; what have you done?† (John 18:33) Pilate is attempting to keep order in his city and rather not involveShow MoreRelatedThe Trial Of Jesus Of Nazareth874 Words   |  4 Pagestogether the texts. This is exactly the issue that S.G.F. Brandon explores in his book, The Trial of Jesus of Nazareth. Within his first chapter, â€Å"History or Theology? The Basic Problems of the Evidence of the Trial of Jesus,† he raises several important questions that historians must keep in mind. Did the people who wrote down the Gospels mean for the works to be a purely factual, historical accounts of Jesus’s trial and death, or did they mean for them to be religious, theological works? After all,theRead MoreThe Illegal Proceeding of Christs Trial1155 Words   |  5 Pages There were many, many illegal things that happe ned at Jesus trial. Their goal was to get Him condemned, not to truly and lawfully find out if He was guilty. They had been trying for a long time to find a way to put Him to death. Now, they had him in their hand and they did their best to get rid of Him. â€Å"If these men had intended to conduct a legal trial, a specific charge would have been made against Christ, and a warrant for His arrest would have been issued.†1 Since this was not what they wantedRead MoreThe Trials of Christ from His Arrest to His Death on the Cross1322 Words   |  6 PagesThe Trials of Christ from His Arrest to His Death on the Cross Introduction Jesus was in Jerusalem because he was trying to fulfill the prophesy that the Messiah would die and rise again in three days. Jesus entered Jerusalem on a donkey. As they proceeded into Jerusalem many people spread their cloaks on the road, while others spread palms they had cut in the fields. Those who followed shouted, Hosanna! Blessed is he who comes in the name of the Lord. Blessed is Read MoreThe Illegal Proceeding of Christs Trial992 Words   |  4 Pagesby accident? Jesus trial was filled with these â€Å"mistakes.† One writer said this about the trial of Christ, â€Å"...the condemnation and execution of Jesus Christ was absolutely illegal, unwarranted, and worse than atrocious...†1 Jesus had four main enemies and many things that were illegal against him, but he is our Lord. Jesus enemies were the Pharisees, Sadducees, the Herodians, and the Chief Priests. They each had their own reasons for hating Jesus. The Pharisees hated Jesus because they thoughtRead MoreYou Are Not Alone? Essay874 Words   |  4 Pages(Matthew 28:20) Jesus talks to his disciple’s right before He was about to ascend into Heaven. He leaves a very important message for his disciples to remember. The fact that He was always with them to the very end of the age. Do you know the depth of what this verse means? Although Jesus was leaving His disciples, He was stating He would still be with them, but how? It’s like an oxymoron. How can He leave them but still be there with them? Simple, in spirit. I learned the reality of trials and strugglesRead More The Jewish Messiah 818 Words   |  4 Pages Jesus Christ or the professed Jewish Messiah was tried for terrible blasphemy. It was a great catastrophe. Had Jesus given a fair trial then His claim for divine Messiahship would have been established. Unfortunately the laws were bent and the eyes were closed and thus a fair judgment was prevented. There is no doubt that this was the most terrible miscarriage of justice ever experienced by the mankind. In open court it was admitted by Jesus Christ that He was God in human flesh. What ever wouldRead MoreThe Gospel Of Mark s Gospel1493 Words   |  6 Pages When you read the Gospel of Mark, there are things that can be taken away in the sense that they serve as a purpose for explaining the honor and shame within Mark’s Gospel. The Gospel of Mark starts out with the baptism of Jesus and ends with the burial of Jesus in the tomb. While Mark’s gospel is short and sweet, i t is the shortest Synoptic Gospel and is meant to be heard, not read. Going through the Gospel of Mark, Mark focuses on how to have trust, whether that’s trusting God or trusting yourselfRead MoreThe Apostle Paul The Foundation For Salvation, Faith, The Church, And Christian Growth1494 Words   |  6 Pagesrightly dividing the word of truth.† (2 Tim 2:15). Jesus stated, â€Å"I must be about my Father’s business† (Luke 2:49). In Paul’s life, he also went about doing the Lord’s business. Paul responded to the high calling of God by laying down, or breaking new ground, in order to grow in the Lord while giving birth to churches that are scripturally correct and have their proper reverence. Marshall 2 H. J. Hester stated that Paul â€Å"caught the spirit of Jesus and breathed that spirit into Gentile ChristianityRead MoreJesus Christ Called Holy Week Essay1726 Words   |  7 PagesOn Palm Sunday, Jesus and his disciples spent the night in Bethany, a town about two miles east of Jerusalem. In all likelihood, Jesus stayed in the home of Mary, Martha, and Lazarus, whom Jesus had raised from the dead. Beginning with Palm Sunday, we will walk through the week; the steps of Jesus Christ called â€Å"Holy Week†. We will visit each of the major events that occurred during our Savior s week of passion. On the Sunday before his death, Jesus began his trip to Jerusalem, knowing that soonRead MoreThe Testament Of The Bible833 Words   |  4 Pageshistorical background, it could help comprehend the meaning behind the book being written. If we really want to understand the bible to help us grow spiritually, we must be informed in our history. It could tell us why our ancestors went t hrough certain trials. We can then know why we still face dilemmas from their past actions today. History continues to affect our lives, and if we learn from the past it could salvage the future. The Gospels are written for different reasons. Some go more in depth on

Arvin

Arvin-and-Edgar team bolsters Long Wharf Essay More than 20 years since taking over the highest positions at New Havens Long Wharf Theatre, Arvin Brown and M. Edgar Rosenblum still share an office. Its not because they are required to. Since Brown became the theatres artistic director 25 years ago and Rosenblum joined him as executive director three years later, the two have seen the theatres facilities twice expanded. What began as a rabbit warren of offices with one performing space in 1965 is now a relatively expansive complex with rehearsal rooms, production shops, offices and two performing spaces. The fundamental things are now in place, 25 years later, Rosenblum says with hard-earned humor. What is apparent is that Brown and Rosenblums shared space is as fundamental as the cement blocks and beams supporting the walls of Long Wharfs theatres the literal manifestation of their ability to work elbow-to-elbow and provide a different sort of foundation for the distinguished company. These two Connecticut Jews, theyre really this sort of married couple, says Gordon Edelstein, Long Wharfs associate director, who has staged plays at Long Wharf the past two seasons. They take vacations together with their wives. They go off to England, the fourt of them, as if theyre not bored together. I cant imagine it. On a recent winter evening, the two sit in their office, a sweater-clad Rosenblum in his familiar post at the offices only desk and a casually attired Brown sinking into one of two couches. This, Rosenblum later confides, is how they usually work. Both men appear slightly fatigued, but neither looks his age 51 in Browns case, 60 in Rosenblums. And neither, unless hes cheating, has been rendered fully gray by a quarter of a century in nonprofit theatre. It is the middle of a preview week for John Tillingers production of Adventures in the Skin Trade, and both men have been functioning as midwives, helping to create Tillingers ambitious, part-musical adaptation of Dylan Thomass unfinished work. Rosenblum has (as usual, according to his staff) been present throughout the technical and preview performance periods. A self-described techie, Rosenblum has no production manager on his staff, but instead directly oversees the production process. Brown, who is in the midst of directing a New York-bound, Joan Collins-fueled production of Private Lives, has managed to duck into rehearsals and run-throughs and tonight will see the show in its entirety. We just told somebody downstairs what this interview was about, Rosenblum says that we are the oldest living couple in the American theatre. Brown booms with laughter, as he often will at Rosenblums jibes, then adds, No, not quite. Thats Hume and Jessie, if youre talking couples. Rosenblum, in turn, breaks into a wide grin at the comparison to the venerable Cronyns. The exchange seems part of a long-running Arvin Edgar show, a spontaneous but utterly familiar pattern of play established by two friends who genuinely like and entertain each other. Apart from their obvious mutual affection, the heart of Brown and Rosenblums longevity as a team in the fraught world of nonprofit theatre seems to be a foundation of trust in the others talents and a large measure of contentment that each finds in his assigned role. I once directed a play, Rosenblum says, and it scared the life out of me. (Brown roars.) Ive always had a view that theres somebody over here whos an artistic director who has a vision of what the artistic product and process should be, and my job is to support that. I feel very powerful. I know thats a bad word, but I feel very powerful supporting that thing. That thing is, of course, the play or in this case, the play reason, which, by the admission of both men and staff members, is Browns province. Thats the hardest part of the job, says the director, who this year selected five plays for the 487-seat mainstage space and four for the 200-seat Stage II space. Its ultimately my responsibility, no matter what. I mean, I can have all the advisers in the world. Certainly Edgar has suggestions; Joey Tillinger works very closely with me on evolving the season, but in the long run, its my decision. I am judged by the program of plays as much as by any other factor. Newton Schenck, who was chairman of the board at Long Wharf for most of Browns tenure and now retains the position of board chairman emeritus, says the board stays out of season-planning decisions. We in no way tell Arvin what plays hes going to do, Schenck says. I dont suppose many artistic directors would stay at a theatre where the board dictated the artistic product. The only thing we have to be careful of is the budget, of course. We tell Arvin what we can afford, and he has to stay within that. Over the years, Long Wharf has produced 220 productions including 37 American premieres and 29 world premieres. In addition, more than 20 productions have been transferred to theatres on Broadway and Off Broadway. If subscription numbers reflect public endorsement of play choices and productions, then Brown has been judged favorably over the years. The theatres subscriptions grew to a high of 18,000 in the media-blitzed 1989-90 25th-anniversary season. That the number dropped this year to just over 16,000 is attributed, by Rosenblum, to the recession, which is proving especially fierce in New England. Comparison of Two Films EssayThere has been speculation over the years, generally in the context of a successful New York transfer, that both men might leave Long Wharf for what are perceived by some to be greener pastures. Brown and Rosenblum refute the notion. Its never been true, Brown says. No matter how inviting the opportunity, theres always been some way of incorporating it within the framework of what I do here. Also, ultimately, Id rather work here than anywhere else I mean I enjoy it more, which is what says it all in the long run. As curtain time approaches, Brown is joined by his wife, actress Joyce Ebert. They make a courteous withdrawl to join the audience in the house. The sounds of the settling crowd can be heard clearly through a speaker in the office wall. Rosenblum waits, his head cocked to listen. When the applause begins, he rises from his chair and, drawing a curtain away from a small window opposite his desk, watches the start of the play. This ones got some problems, he says, but we can fix it. ENTRANCES EXITS Irene Lewis, acting artistic director of Baltimores Center Stage for the past season, has been named artistic director. Lewis replaces Stan Wojewodsk Jr., who resigned last year when he was appointed to head the Yale Repertory Theatre in New Haven, Conn. Lewis has been associated with Center Stage since 1980 as guest director and associate artist, and previously served as artistic director of the Philadelphia Drama Guild and associate director of the Hartford Stage Company in Connecticut. Lewis directed this seasons opening production at Center Stage, The Queen and the Rebels by Ugo Betti, and will helm Shakespeares Pericles and Moleires The Misanthrope later in the season. Richard Hamburger, artistic director of Maines Portland Stage Company since 1987, will resign to assume the artistic directorship at the Dallas Theater Center following the current season. Hamburgers 1990 production of Twelfth Night was Portlands inaugural Shakespeare production, and he recently directed Machiavellis The Mandrake for the company. He will helm the final play of the season, Jon Robin Baitzs The Substance of Fire, as a co-production with the Dallas Theater Center, where he first staged the play last winter. Dallas has been without an artistic director since the death of Ken Bryant in October, 1990. A search committee has been formed at Portland Stage to conduct a national search for Hamburgers successor. John Dillon, artistic director of the Milwaukee Repertory Theater, has announced that he will resign to seek other artistic opportunities following the 1992-93 season. In his 15-year tenure at the theatre, Dillon has pioneered international exchange programs with companies around the world, expanded the Reps resident acting ensemble to include a variety fo artistic positions, and continually emphasized multi-racial and nontraditional casting. The Rep, a four-theatre complex, has formed a search committee to name Dillons successor. . . . Elizabeth Huddle will resign from Seattles Intiman Theatre Company following her seventh season as artistic director in December 1992. Huddle most recently directed A Midsummer Nights Dream for the theatre, which is currently co-producing its acclaimed production of The Kentucky Cycle with the Mark Taper Forum in Los Angeles. A search committee has been formed to name her successor. The Idaho Shakespeare Festival has appointed Charles Fee artistic director. Fee is an actor, director and educator, and is currently artistic director of the Sierra Repertory Theatre in Sonora, Calif. . . . Michael Stotts has been named managing director of the New Jersey Shakespeare Festival. Stotts has been the Festivals general manager since October of last year, and previously served as company manager at the Manhattan Theatre Club . . . . Californias Marin Theatre Company has named Regina Lickteig managing director. Lickteig previously managed the PlayMakers Repertory Company in Chapel Hill, N.C. Kate C. Busch is the new director of development at Hartford Stage Company, where she will be responsible for government and community relations, long range planning and development of foundations and corporations. Busch previously served as executive director of the Alliance of Resident Theatres/New York, a trade and service organization for the New York City nonprofit theatre. Canadas Stratford Festival has named Marti Maraden director of the 1992 Young Company, where she will be in charge of the training program and will direct the festivals summer production of Shakespeares The Two Gentlemen of Verona. Maraden has been affiliated with the festival for eight seasons as an actor and director . . . . Cora Mirikitani has been named program officer in culture at the Pew Charitable Trusts, a national philanthropy based in Philadelphia. Mirikitani has previously served as executive director of the Greater Philadelphia Cultural Alliance, managing director of the Japan America Theatre and, most recently, director of performing arts and film for the Japan Society. The International Theatre Institute Worldwide has reelected Martha W. Coigney for a third two-year term as president. Coigney, currently director of the U.S. Center of ITI, has been affiliated with the organization for 25 years . . . . Margaret Lioi, administrator of New Yorks Eleanor Naylor Dana Charitable Trust since 1989, has been appointed the foundations executive director.